<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Hollenbeck Group LLC - Latest Comments</title><link>http://hollenbeck.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://hollenbeck.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 20:02:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: When big PR comes a callin&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://hollenbeckgroup.com/when-big-pr-comes-a-callin/#comment-820520115</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the post - I agree completely, and have asked the exact questions as a start-up client. It will be interesting to see what happens with Edelman's Sprout program. I've had the best luck with boutique firms who are willing to work on smaller retainers that have the potential to grow with the success of the PR strategy (yes, metrics). The other plus is always working with the same person who pitched the business.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lisa Hannah</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 20:02:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When big PR comes a callin&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://hollenbeckgroup.com/when-big-pr-comes-a-callin/#comment-820269764</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, definitely some applicability to both. Having seen first hand though the pull on margins and how it impacts the way big agencies support startups, the convos about budget and team are I think especially important for a startup to ask a bigger firm. Thx for reading!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KLHollenbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:05:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When big PR comes a callin&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://hollenbeckgroup.com/when-big-pr-comes-a-callin/#comment-820266011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Those seem like smart - but simple - questions for everyone to ask. Big or small.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sara Madison Hawkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:01:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PR I Like</title><link>http://hollenbeckgroup.com/pr-i-like/#comment-730204907</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reading! Every now-and-then PR gets it right (but the misses are fun too). Spin Sucks is bookmarked. Great job with the site.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh Rein</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 09:57:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PR I Like</title><link>http://hollenbeckgroup.com/pr-i-like/#comment-730131119</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OMG! The links in the first paragraph made me laugh out loud! Very, very nice look at PR done well. Thanks for including the case study we did at Spin Sucks on FedEx.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gini Dietrich</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:22:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saying &amp;#8216;I&amp;#8217;m sorry&amp;#8217; shouldn&amp;#8217;t be so hard</title><link>http://hollenbeckgroup.com/saying-im-sorry-shouldnt-be-so-hard/#comment-729662700</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kent:  For what it's worth, I do think we could have done much better on the response, and to that end, while we were late, I think you'll find our CEO's final note on this quite compelling:  &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/TvuOGP" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/TvuOGP"&gt;http://bit.ly/TvuOGP&lt;/a&gt;   I'd also say while our public response was tepid, our private response -- that is the actions we've taken to correct this were both swift and aggressive.  Here's our updated editorial guidelines for example: &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/SBnyai" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/SBnyai"&gt;http://bit.ly/SBnyai&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frank Strong</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:19:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saying &amp;#8216;I&amp;#8217;m sorry&amp;#8217; shouldn&amp;#8217;t be so hard</title><link>http://hollenbeckgroup.com/saying-im-sorry-shouldnt-be-so-hard/#comment-721970250</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the comment Gerry...I did link to your entire post so anyone could read your full response.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think we probably just disagree over the effectiveness and perception that comes from PRSA (which as you acknowledge has a relationship with Vocus) looking to distribute 'blame' in this instance.  Especially to the companies involved...that feels a bit like blaming the victim.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said I do agree you acknowledged the shortcomings of PRWebs system and response - my take is it probably could have largely been left there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think there are much larger, and more interesting conversations that PRSA could (and arguably should) be leading the dialogue on around the implications of services like PRWeb, and a media environment that exists where false news like this is immediately picked up and disseminated vs. verified and then reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I look forward to seeing PRSA speak on those topics soon.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KLHollenbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:48:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saying &amp;#8216;I&amp;#8217;m sorry&amp;#8217; shouldn&amp;#8217;t be so hard</title><link>http://hollenbeckgroup.com/saying-im-sorry-shouldnt-be-so-hard/#comment-721960381</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kent, first let me say that I’m flattered you took the time&lt;br&gt;to read my post. However, it does seem as though you highlighted only the&lt;br&gt;content that supports your premise and, in doing so, misrepresented what I&lt;br&gt;said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To the contrary, I noted — among other things — that PRWeb distributes to an&lt;br&gt;indiscriminate audience; its failure to have adequate safeguards in place to&lt;br&gt;prevent this type of event (which, I did caveat with the undeniable fact that,&lt;br&gt;where there’s a will, there’s a way to circumvent such safeguards); its tepid&lt;br&gt;and widely criticized statement (where we seem to agree); its questionable&lt;br&gt;internal processes to maintain the integrity of the releases it distributes;&lt;br&gt;and its decision to leave a link to the release live on its site for hours&lt;br&gt;after the news was debunked as being false.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don’t consider this apologizing for them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What I did say, though, is that PRWeb is not the only party&lt;br&gt;who deserves blame. And as I said, I’m happy to cover the topic of whether or&lt;br&gt;not services like PRWeb are good for the profession in another blog at another&lt;br&gt;time. Clearly, you too must understand that you can’t cover all topics in a&lt;br&gt;single blog post, given that you also chose to ignore this angle while&lt;br&gt;criticizing me for it.&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the opportunity to clarify.&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;Gerry Corbett&lt;br&gt;Chair and Chief Executive Officer&lt;br&gt;PRSA&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gerard Francis Corbett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:38:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stop killing your creative</title><link>http://hollenbeckgroup.com/stop-killing-your-creative/#comment-686488360</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is great! I 100% agree, excellent insight.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Simple7</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:28:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boom!</title><link>http://hollenbeckgroup.com/boom/#comment-662046868</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Small teams FTW! I'm really excited for you on your new venture. Best of luck sir. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vin Thomas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:36:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>